SLCBC Intermodal Hub Bike Transit Center TE Application

This is a funding proposal for the Intermodal Hub BikeStation in Salt Lake City based on the Application

1.1 NAME OR TITLE

Salt Lake Intermodal Hub Bike Transit Center

1.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND LENGTH

The proposed Bike Transit Center would be located in the downtown Salt Lake City Intermodal Hub at 320 South 600 West. The project would have two phases. The first would be a feasibility and design study. Pending the results of that study, the second phase would be the build out in the Intermodal Hub as well as establishing initial operations.

1.3 PROJECT SPONSOR(S)

Lead Sponsor: UTA Rideshare, a division of Utah Transit Authority

Co-Sponsor(s): Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake City Bicycle Collective

1.4 APPLICATION CONTACT PERSON(S)

(1) Shaina Miron Quinn Title: Regional Marketing Specialist / UTA Rideshare Address: 3600 South 700 West City: SLC State: UT Zip: 84130 Phone: 801-287-2066 Fax: 801-262-8031

(2) Jonathan L. Morrison Title: Project Coordinator / Salt Lake City Bicycle Collective Address: 2312 S. West Temple City: SLC State: UT Zip: 84115 Phone: 801-328-2453 Fax: 801-466-3856

(3) Jordan Gates Title: Environmental Advisor to the Mayor / Salt Lake City Corporation Address: 451 S. State St. #306 City: SLC State: UT Zip: 84111 Phone: 801-535-7939 Fax: 801-535-6331

1.5 Funding Request

A = FEDERAL FUNDS REQUESTED = $68,000 B = ALL CASH REQUIRED PLUS FLEX (SOFT) MATCH = $55,000 + $13,750

SPONSOR MATCH = B / (A+B)X 100% = $13,750 / ($13,750+55,000) * 100% = 20%

1.6 Statement of Intent to Fund, Pursue Reasonable Progress and Maintain

Shaina will sign this.

1.7 Enhancement Categories by Group

Check all that apply. Enter approximate percentage of project cost estimated for that category. A project may be awarded additional points if multiple categories apply, provided that the applicant effectively demonstrates how each will complement one another and is significant (>15% of project total cost).

DONE ON PAPER

Bicycle and Pedestrian

X 1-100% Facilities for pedestrians and bicycles, check system type below

• X Major Regional system
• X Local/Link to Regional
• X Local System (town, city, etc.,..)

1.8 Executive Summary

Provide a concise overview within the remaining space provided on this page only answering the "Technical Scope or what" is your project. Other sections are provided for the benefits and users of the proposed project. When possible list quantity details such as project length, area improved, improvement to resource etc.

COME BACK TO THIS ONCE ENTIRE APPLICATION IS DONE

George -- Is this different than section 1.2?

2.0 Application Inventory

2.1 Please check the appropriate box for each question or cross out if Non Applicable. You may insert a sentence of explanation for "No" answers in the space provided below that question:

• Application has required registration number (07-PTE XXX)? Yes
• Has the applicant UDOT regional office been contacted? Yes
• For historic resources only: have you contacted the SHPO? N/A
• Will the project be open to the public for at least 25 years? Yes
• Will a fee be charged for public access? If yes, how much? Yes

If yes, explain how the fees charged will be used. ??? QUESTION: TBD as part of a feasibility study OK?

• Is the project a component or extension of a previously awarded transportation enhancements project? No

If so, give the project number: STP-

• Does all right of way necessary for the project fall within public ownership or lease? Yes
• Does the project sponsor own all of the right of way/property? Yes
• If right-of-way/land acquisition is necessary, has the owner signed a letter of understanding & intent to sale the property? N/A
• If no, does the applicant have an option on the property executable within one year of application? N/A
• Have utilities been Blue Staked for critical areas? N/A

If yes, list those areas or limits of survey: N/A

• Have utilities been contacted or consulted on the project? N/A

2.2 Sponsor Experience with any Federal Aid Programs

Briefly describe sponsor's experience with federal funded programs. Include specific staff by name if assigned to this project.

UTA Rideshare -- Bicycle Lockers:

In 2006 UTA Rideshare accepted 60 bicycle lockers funded in part by a TE grant. These bicycle lockers will be used by commuters connecting bicycle trips with a UTA TRAX light rail or UTA bus trip. The lockers are currently being assembled by UTA facilities and will be installed at 15 locations during the spring of 2007. The UTA Rideshare staff member assigned to this project is Shaina Miron Quinn.

Salt Lake City Bicycle Collective -- BikeEd Program:

In 2006 the Salt Lake City Bicycle Collective started a Bicycle Education program funded by a TE grant. The grant was written by Jason Bultman (jason@slcbikecollective.org) and executed by Jonathan Morrison (jonathan@slcbikecollective.org).

2.3 Environmental and Cultural Resource Inventory

The TE program is intended for projects that required only a Categorical Exclusion Environmental Clearance. If the project involves any of the following natural or cultural items the applicant may be required to meet with UDOT to confirm application eligibility, or to obtain specific permits and clearance forms to ensure compliance with local, state and federal requirements, or fund the Environmental Phase prior to obtaining matching federal funds.

Will the project involve:

* Historic buildings or archeological sites?	No
* Existing parks and recreation areas?	No
* Designated or undesignated wetlands and/or swamps?	No
* Canals, creeks or rivers?	No
* Stream straightening and/or crossing?	No
* Lakes or ponds?	No
* Known hazardous materials and/or waste?	No
* Features under the 100-year flood elevation?	No

For all "yes" answers, explain any measure needed to avoid negative impacts during or after the implementation of the project. You may use th remaining space on this page for expanded explanations.

(7 POINTS) APPLICATION QUALITY No input required. You are allowed to deleted all of the Blue Italics to provide additional space for your application information needed to support the above section only.

Applications may be awared points for overall clarity and the use of new innovative techniques. Clarity include following the instructions, organization of the application materials and well-written but concise descriptions (no grammar, typographical or mathematical errors).

3.0 Project Purpose, Benefits and Direct Affects

Use and arrange the spacing over the next two pages as needed to answer sections 3 & 4. Do not exceed two pages.

3.1 Describe the fundamental purpose and need for the proposed project:

Why is there a project? The project purpose solves or meets a need of your community, county or state. Parts of this section may be redundant. That is OK. Section 3.1 is the most important sub section here and should be the foundation and support for the complete proposal.

The fundamental purpose of this project is to increase the usage of bicycles for transportation by making bicycling more appealing and accessible to the public. As the population along the Wasatch Front grows so will traffic, congestion and air pollution from vehicles. As many transportation planners have noted, building only more roads and more car parking is ultimately an unsustainable venture. From an international perspective a common solution to this issue has simply been alternative and public transportation. It is well documented that improving the connectivity between bicycles, transit, and places of business is one of the most cost effective, equitable, efficient, and environmentally beneficial means of addressing transportation dilemmas. The use of bicycles as a form of transportation also reduces air pollution, vehicle congestion and mitigates the effects of urban sprawl, thus enhancing the quality of life. Today, approximately .06% of all transportation trips are taken on bicycles (State of Utah Census, 2000). Achieving greater bicycle use will require, among other things, developing bike-transit facilities that offer enhanced services to bicyclists as well as a secure place to park their bike, thereby enabling the use of both bicycling and transit over single-occupant vehicles.

Although a relatively new concept in the United States, secure bicycle parking is an everyday way of life in Europe and Japan, where facilities that house and park over 3,000 bicycles per day are not uncommon. Bringing the Wasatch Front to this level of bicycle ridership will require a cultural shift, which can be accomplished by education, marketing, enhanced facilities (including bicycle transit centers, routes and signage), and leadership by the public sector to make bicycling a priority mode of transportation.

The Salt Lake Intermodal Hub not only connects many modes of transportation, but it defines Salt Lake's strong commitment to meeting the alternative and public transportation needs of the Wasatch Front. The addition of a bicycle transit center will galvanize and complement the other forms of transportation. FrontRunner, the new UTA commuter rail, is estimated to bring three thousand people into Salt Lake City every day. UTA's current TRAX and bus infrastructure can accommodate (FILL IN)% patrons with bicycles, to show the demand cyclists represent 2% of UTA's ridership. If this 2% trend continues, FrontRunner alone will bring over 60 bicycles through the Intermodal Hub.

To further encourage cyclists and complement the efforts of UTA, the bicycle transit center will make bicycle commuting even more convenient. A repair center, the sale of last minute convenience items, a secure place to store a bike, and a place to rent a bicycle appeal to the on-demand nature of our busy society.

3.2 Project Description:

Provide a complete scope. What are the existing conditions, where is the project in relation to the greater area or system, linkage to destinations and the surface transportation system. Coordinate this section with Maps, illustration and photos provided.

The project scope is to study and develop a plan for a possible bicycle transit center at the Salt Lake Intermodal Hub. The feasibility study will include the following components: Site Location Analysis, Demand Analysis, Needs Assessment, Design, and Operating Plan.

In just a few years the Salt Lake Intermodal Hub will become the surface transportation center of the Wasatch Front. Today its convenient downtown location serves travelers well by connecting Salt Lake City to the local community via city streets and bicycle lanes, the Jordan River Parkway, UTA local buses, taxis, car parking lots and pedestrian access. The Intermodal Hub also connects Salt Lake City and Utah with other states via Greyhound buses, Interstate 15 and Amtrak trains. In 2008 the Hub will add UTA FrontRunner commuter rail from Weber and Davis County, UTA express buses serving Weber, Davis and Utah County, and UTA TRAX light rail serving Salt Lake County. Eventually the Hub will also serve a UTA TRAX light rail extension to the Salt Lake City International Airport, UTA FrontRunner commuter rail to Provo, and the Denver & Rio Grand Western Bike Trail. The addition of a bicycle transit center to the Salt Lake Intermodal Hub will add bicycles as a regional transportation option to those living and working along the Wasatch Front.

3.3 Describe Direct Benefits and/or Affects of the project:

Include any social, environmental, economic, system operations and other applicable elements. Note that the EAC will want to know why other possible alternatives are not available to meet your project purpose and need. You may want to address this issue in section 6.3 if not here.

Bike transit centers include much more than just bicycle racks. A bicycle transit center enables bikes to become an integral part of the transportation system.

Please note that this is NOT a request for another bike path, more bicycle signage or bicycle education. All of those projects are important and necessary, but a bicycle transit center is unique and provides different benefits. A bicycle transit center is the best alternative because the installation of secure bicycle parking at transit stops, combined with targeted bicycle facility improvements, can be expected to increase suburban transit use significantly in many communities. In California, surveys show that over 30% of secure bicycle parking users previously drove a car alone to their destination or to a transit park-and-ride lot. Bike-and-ride systems offer transit agencies not only lower system access costs, but the ability to tap market segments untouched by the existing car-based transit systems.

Direct benefits of a bicycle transit center include taking automobiles off the road and reducing vehicle miles traveled. By encouraging bike-and-ride to a major transportation hub, a bicycle transit center would effectively expand the service area of the public transit operation and exponentially increase the efficiency of the entire transportation system. A shift from park-and-ride to bike-and-ride frees up valuable and very limited car-parking spaces at park-and-ride lots, resulting in a direct increase in transit ridership and a reduction in overall vehicle miles traveled in the region. A bicycle transit center works to help keep all traffic flowing including buses, cars and shipping trucks. In other words, encouraging bicycle travel meets both the goals of reducing costs for agencies and managing demand on the increasingly congested roadway system.

A bicycle transit center completes the picture for a true multi-modal transportation network with a bike-specific community resource. It brings national visibility to Salt Lake City's efforts to be recognized as a bicycle-friendly city. It keeps Salt Lake City's transportation system on par with other western cities such as Portland, Denver and Seattle. For the public, a bicycle transit center becomes the place to go to for secure bike parking, bicycle information, rentals, bicycle retail and repairs. Nothing similar exists along the Wasatch Front today, and there is no other location like the Salt Lake Intermodal Hub in Utah.

3.4 Maps, illustrations, photos:

Up to four standard borderless pages are allowed. Pages that fold over are not allowed. For trail way project include: Project map, area map showing context of project in larger area, illustrations of typical sections & plans, width, length, material types, and examples of existing conditions. All maps should clearly note: North direction, project beginning, end and length, generators, destination and linkage features as identified in other sections of your application. Maps may be illustrations or schematic in nature. TIP - some applicants incorporate typical sections on project area maps leaving more space to show other project existing features, needs and illustrations of improvements.

1. Salt Lake Intermodal Hub blueprint highlighting proposed space for bicycle transit center

2. Salt Lake Intermodal Hub location map showing transportation connections

3. Gallery of existing bike station photos

4. Wasatch Front Regional Council's 2030 Long Range Plan Bicycle Plan Update Map

4.0 Safety:

Are there safety elements or issues of this project addresses or corrects?

A bicycle transit center is an excellent resource to promote bicycle safety and distribute essential information to cyclists. Today a multitude of websites, schools, government agencies, non-profit organizations and bicycle shops serve this purpose, but there is no single spot to efficiently gather a cross-section of bicycle safety information. The staff at the bicycle transit center can help the public choose safe bike routes and can publicize bike safety classes. The bicycle transit center can stock and distribute printed materials like the Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County bike maps, copies of bicycle laws, bicycle commuter guides, and bikes-on-transit brochures.

Cyclists are safest when their bicycle is properly equipped and functioning well. Cyclists can use a bicycle transit center for minor repairs such as changing a flat tire, oiling a chain or getting a bike tune up. They can pick up bicycle safety accessories such as lights, reflectors and helmets.

A bicycle transit center's visibility also means greater exposure of cycling to motorists. When motorists are more aware of cycling as a transportation choice, it reminds them to look for cyclists on the road and it may help decrease car-bicycle accidents.

5.0 Quality of Life Enhancement and/or Indirect Affects

Estimated economic effects - Can reduce the number of automobile parking spaces needed saving $15,000 per space. Virtually eliminate the risk of bicycle theft from a public facility. Save money by cycling. Save time on their commute. Bicycles do not contribute to street traffic congestion and traffic jams that frustrate motorists, have a real economic cost and reduce quality of life along the Wasatch Front.

Social - A positive side effect of making cycling convenient and easy is that it starts appealing to a broader audience. They often enjoy meeting their fellow bike commuters which can strenghten the social fabric of a community. It becomes natural to strike up conversations with other cyclists; this experience is impossible in confines of a car.

Health - Bike commuters also reduce their personal health risk and lower their impact on the healthcare system. Those that ride will experience the benefits of daily exercise.

Environmental - Jordan is helping with this too (Jan 22). Bicycles simply do not contribute to the air pollution that the Wasatch Front suffers from during inversions. The more people we can get on bikes, the better off our air will be.

Aesthetic - Fewer bicycles left unattended locked to outside bike racks. Reduced wear and tear on UTA trains and buses from bike tires. The Bike Station would be designed to complement the Intermodal Hub setting to create a positive impression to users and passers-by alike.

Historic value - ?

6.0 Project Significance/Importance

6.3 Project Potential

6.3.1 Access to Proposed Resource:

Grand Total: 360 users in a typical year. This calculation is based on the following projections: We estimate that about 125 people will use this facility each week commuting to work by bicycle. Yearly usage estimate with some turnover: 160 people. A smaller percentage (about 5 people a week) will be recreational cyclists that use the facility once or twice a year. Yearly recreational usage with regular turnover: 200. *More detail for bikes on board UTA* 2% of 3,000 daily FrontRunner Commuter Rail passengers will be bicycle commuters = 60 potential users. 2% of 5,000 daily TRAX passengers connecting to the Intermodal Hub will be bicycle commuters = 100 potential users. 2% of 3,000 daily bus passengers connecting to the Intermodal Hub will be bicycle commuters = 60 potential users. There will be some overlap between these groups. Not all bicycle commuters will park their bike at the Bike Station, but they may utilize it for minor repairs or for information.

6.3.2 Project Function

Provide all information under the sub-group. Coordinate information with the maps, photos and illustrations sections. How and when is your project resource used for each of the following sub-groups that were indicated in section 1.7.

100% is allocated to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Group.

6.3.2a Bicycle and Pedestrian Group

TIP: list trip origination, link from or links along project and destination or link to other trail system. Have you explained why other alternate routes are not reasonable or availiable? How does your project meet the transportation demand of the community?

Target user

% Commuter = 90% Recreational/Tourist = 10%

If trail expected to be maintained year round? _____ TIP - You can answer yes with a yes or no. Adding a sentence of why could get you a few more points.

The Salt Lake Intermodal Hub is designed and located to meet the downtown commuting needs of the Wasatch front. The jordan river parkway trail, recreational downtown facilities, and shopping may draw a recreational demographic.

6.3.2b Scenic and Natural Resources Group

List any scenic byway, existing or proposed view sheds enhanced by this project. Why should this be a priority over similar proposal? What makes this an asset to the community?

N/A

6.3.2c Historic and Archeological Group

List any local, state or federal agencies connected or supporting this project. Why should this be a priority over a similar proposal? What makes this an asset to the community?

N/A

7.0 Public Support, Involvement and Partnerships

Describe the public involvement outreach activities completed, or planned, to gain support and sustain use of this project resource. Describe any partnerships that will be developed as part of this project. Describe any anticipated opposition to the project and how that opposition will be addressed. Do not exceed this page to complete section 7.

Involvement and Outreach

• UTA BikeStation Notice of Public Hearing

Support

• Mayor's Bicycle Advisory Committee (MBAC) Chairman, Louis Melini - Jonathan
• Salt Lake County Bicycle Advisory Committee (SLCBAC) Chairman, Dan Fazzini Jr. - Jonathan
• Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) ???? - Jonathan
• Utah Transit Authority (UTA) Capital Development - Shaina
• Wasatch Front Regional Council - Shaina
• Salt Lake County, Charlie Kulp? - Jonathan
• Salt Lake City - Jordan
• Division of Air Quality - Pat
• Utah Energy Office - Pat

Opposition

Like any use of tax payer money, there are organizations that will oppose any use of tax payer dollars. We hope to justify this traffic congestion cost numbers and???

8.0 Application Funding

All costs exceeding proposed budget are paid 100% by the sponsor. The Cost Summary Table below is to remain on this page only to format provided. Changes to task names are allowed when approved by Program Engineer.

8.1 Synergy

The EAC encourages projects to team up. Is the sponsor partnering with other state, federal, public or private groups for funding? Is this project part of or combined with another surface transportation project? List any other federal programs funding this project such as; Safe Routes to School, CMAO or any of the STP roadway program funds.

8.2 Cost Estimate Summary

List the major project costs in the table provided below. Not all budget categories may apply to all projects. Flexible or Soft match may come from the applicant's resources or from a third-party in-kind donation as property, materials, labor or cash.

Project Items Format shown for Traditional Transportation Project. Modify as needed for Non-Traditional Projects.	Total Task Cost & Value	Cash Expenses	Soft Match, Donations & Contributions	Project non-eligible items paid 100% by sponsor.
1. Right of Way Acquisition	N/A	N/A	N/A	$ Area resold for alternate use.
2. UDOT Oversight $5-k minimum (Recommend 3 to 5% of items 3-6 below)	$5,000	N/A	N/A	N/A
3. Design/Preliminary Engineering (No more than 15% of items 4-6 allowed for federal funding)	$68,750	$55,000	$13,750	$ Cost exceeds 15% limit.
4. Utility Relocation* (Local Government Franchise Agreements may not govern.)	N/A	N/A	N/A	$ Utility work not project required.
5. Labor/Construction/Materials, use current UDOT price recommendation	N/A	N/A	N/A	$ Cost over limit
6. Construction Inspection/Certification (5% to 15% of items 4 & 5 above)	N/A	N/A	N/A	$ Cost exceeds 15%
7. 5% inflation per year on items 4-6 (3 year limit)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
8. 25% Contigency required for budget on items 4 & 5. 15% if project already has Environmental Clearance	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
FEDERAL FUNDS $ / SPONSOR CASH $ / FLEXIBLE MATCH $ / APPLICATION MATCH %	$68,750 Box 1 = Box 2 + Box 3 TOTAL PROJECT VALUE (TPV)	$55,000 Box 2 Total Cash Budget	$13,750 Box 3 Total Soft Match & Donations	$0 Expenses in this column may or may not count as match

8.3 Critical Funding Check

8.3.1 Determine maximum Federal Aid request for the application

Max Federal Aid if application is $625,000 or less in Box 1

= 0.8 x Box 1 = N/A

Max Federal Aid if application is greater than $625,000 or less in Box 1

= (Box1 -625,000/2) + $500,000 = N/A

State the maximum Federal Aid this application can request = $ QUESTION

You may end up not request the maximum.

8.3.2 Determine the Project Cash Demand (PCD) and if additional cash is required to fund all cash requests

Attach an additional sheet detailing the costs described above. Clearly identify what the project will have to pay for in cash. Then determine the Project Cash Demand (PCD) defined as: The total of the cash items plus contingency on all items requiring cash funds to produce the project. If applicable, describe all local groups/agencies that will complete work as part of the applicant's plan as a donation or are expecting a cash reimbursement.

State your Project Cash Demand PCD = $55,000

State the Federal / Aid this application is requesting = $68,750 Make sure this is the same number that is listed in the summary table section 8.2

Minimum cash required in addition to Federal Aid requested = PCD - Federal Aid = $0

This is the minimum cash the Sponsor(s) will need to fully fund the project expenses. Applicants may elect to add cash beyond the minimum to over match and be awarded additional points.

Calculate application match percentage.

Let $s = Sponsor supplied cash + soft match value

Let TPV = Total Project Value or Box 1

Applicant match percentage = $s / TPV x 100% = $ QUESTION

8.4 Application Over Match

Application Over Match: No input is required for this section. Applications must match 20% minimum for any project expense. Applications can earn up to 10 points in 0.1 increments up to 40% over match. The EAC has established matching fund requirements based on the following formula.

Project costs from $50,000 up to $625,000 are matched 80% by federal funds or for a maximum federal aid request of $500,000.

Example of the largest project that can be matched at 80% is $625,000;

80% x $625,000 = $500,000 Federal aid. Sponsor provides 20% or $125,000.

Project costs above the $625,000 are matched 50% by federal aid to a maximum of $1,125,000.\

Example for the largest project of $1,125,000;

Name and title of individual who prepared the cost estimates for this project:

Printed Name of Preparer: Shaina Miron Quinn

Title: Regional Marketing Specialist / UTA Rideshare

Phone Number: 801-262-5626 x1x2066

Preparer's Signature:

Date: 1/31/2007

9.0 Long-Term Maintenance

List entity responsible for the short and long-term project maintenance if other than sponsor. Identify all maintenance participation. Attach supporting documentation to this application if needed.

Will the Sponsor(s) be able to maintain the project for a minimum of 25 years? Yes

List major maintenance activities in the table below:

N/A The intent is to apply for more funding if the feasibility study is approved and the results justify construction.

10.0 Project Schedule

All applicants are required to submit a schedule of implementation. For non-traditional or educational projects, the applicant should indicate major milestones and show that funds can be fully expended 30 months after approval of the STIP. Use the format below to indicate major milestones.

---

UDOT DESIGN PROCESS	DEADLINE TO COMPLETE
Implementation Schedule
	After STIP Approval
	CUMMULATIVE
STANDARD SCHEDULE DATES
1. Project Programmed and Approved	Month 0	15 OCT 07
2. Feasibility Study	Month 1	15 NOV 07
2.1 - Site and Location Analysis	Month 1	15 NOV 07
2.2 - Demand Analysis	Month 1	15 NOV 07
3. Needs Assessment	Month 2	15 DEC 07
3.1 - Determination of Programming	Month 2	15 DEC 07
3.2 - Resource Analysis	Month 2	15 DEC 07
4. Preliminary Design	Month 2	15 DEC 07
5. Intermediate Design	Month 3	15 JAN 08
6. Final Design	Month 4	15 FEB 08
7. Draft Operating Plan	Month 4	15 FEB 08
8. Final Operating Plan	Month 5	15 MAR 08
9. Preparation of Final Report	Month 6	15 APR 08

Option 1

Project starts October 2007 and bids no later than spring 2010:

All Enhancements projects currently on the STIP or applications awarded funding in this current application process that do not advertise for construction by spring 2010, risk losing federal funds if the Enhancements program is not funded in the next Federal Transportation Bill.

Option 2

Project bids on an accelerated schedule prior to fall 2009:

At this time, UDOT anticipates federal funds to be aviliable for project construction that propose an accelerated schedule.

Appendix - A

DETAIL COST ESTIMATE FOR: Salt Lake Intermodal Hub Bike Transit Center

ITEM	QUANTITY	UNIT PRICE OR LUMP SUM	UNIT DONATION FOR FLEX MATCH	TOTAL
Bike Transit Center Consultant	1	$55,000	$13,750	$68,750

Appendix - B

Provide a maximum of five letters of support for application. The UDOT Region Director letter is required.

List all letters of support on this page

1. Mayor's Bicycle Advisory Committee (MBAC) Chairman, Louis Melini
2. Salt Lake County Bicycle Advisory Committee (SLCBAC) Chairman, Dan Fazzini Jr.

Appendix - C

UDOT Central or Region concept overview analysis

ENVIRONMENTAL

Recommendations to reduce impact or risk

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY

Recommendations or Concurrence for project on UDOT Right-Of-Way
Additional items recommended

PRECONSTRUCTION

Viability

RIGHT OF WAY

Are easements needed?

UTILITY RISKS

Mitigation recommendation
Risk anaylsis